HAFEEZA BIBI & ORS. versus SHAIKH FARID (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS
A written gift deed executed by a Mohammadan is not the instrument effecting, creating or making the gift; the essentials of gift under Mohammadan law (declaration, acceptance, delivery of possession) must be fulfilled; registration is not required and the deed is merely evidence. The High Court erred in requiring compulsory registration for a valid gift, as s.129 of the Transfer of Property Act saves Mohammadan law.
- Parties
- Appellant: Hafeeza Bibi & Ors.; Respondent: Shaikh Farid (Dead) By LRs. & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Hiba (muslim Gift), Registration of Gift Deeds, Transfer of Immovable Property, Interpretation of Transfer of Property Act S.123 and S.129, Application of Mohammadan Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hafeeza Bibi & Ors.
Appellant
Shaikh Farid (Dead) By LRs. & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an unregistered written gift deed by a Mohammadan is valid under Indian law
- 2 Whether registration is compulsory for a written gift deed under Mohammadan law when gifting immovable property
Ratio Decidendi
A written gift deed executed by a Mohammadan is not the instrument effecting, creating or making the gift; the essentials of gift under Mohammadan law (declaration, acceptance, delivery of possession) must be fulfilled; registration is not required and the deed is merely evidence. The High Court erred in requiring compulsory registration for a valid gift, as s.129 of the Transfer of Property Act saves Mohammadan law.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- High Court judgment dated September 13, 2004 is set aside
- Judgment and decree of Principal Subordinate Judge, Vishakhapatnam dated April 27, 1988 is restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment