HAKIM ALI AND ANR. versus BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. AND ORS.
Section 339(c) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 makes all provisions of the Land Revenue Act, 1901, including Section 203 on arbitration, applicable to the area covered by the Act. Thus, the Board of Revenue had jurisdiction to refer the dispute in second appeal (arising out of Section 229-B suit) to arbitration, and the limitation suggested by Section 293 does not restrict this jurisdiction.
- Parties
- Appellant: Hakim Ali; Original Plaintiff: Badlu; Respondent No. 2: Lekhi Ram; Respondent No. 1: Board of Revenue, U.P.; Respondent No. 5 / Arbitrator: Shri Anup Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Decision by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration, Jurisdiction of Revenue Courts, Applicability of Land Revenue Act Provisions, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hakim Ali
Appellant
Badlu
Original Plaintiff
Lekhi Ram
Respondent No. 2
Board of Revenue, U.P.
Respondent No. 1
Shri Anup Singh
Respondent No. 5 / Arbitrator
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Decision by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Board of Revenue is competent to refer a dispute relating to bhumidhari rights to arbitration under Section 229-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950
- 2 Applicability and scope of Sections 203, 293, and 339(c) of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 and U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950
Ratio Decidendi
Section 339(c) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 makes all provisions of the Land Revenue Act, 1901, including Section 203 on arbitration, applicable to the area covered by the Act. Thus, the Board of Revenue had jurisdiction to refer the dispute in second appeal (arising out of Section 229-B suit) to arbitration, and the limitation suggested by Section 293 does not restrict this jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment