HARCHARAN SINGH versus MOHINDER SINGH & ORS.
The copy of the relevant entries from the electoral roll was defective, but the defect was not of a substantial character as the details for identifying the appellant as an elector were furnished, and no objection was raised at the scrutiny. The returning officer acted correctly in not rejecting the nomination paper, and the election was not materially affected by the defect.
- Parties
- Appellant: Harcharan Singh; Respondent: Mohinder Singh; Respondents: Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 1968
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order of Punjab and Haryana High Court in Election Petition No. 4 of 1967
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Nomination Paper Scrutiny, Defect in Electoral Roll, Substantial Character of Defect, Purity of Election Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harcharan Singh
Appellant
Mohinder Singh
Respondent
Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order of Punjab and Haryana High Court in Election Petition No. 4 of 1967
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defect in certified copy of entries from electoral roll produced with nomination paper is substantial under s. 36(4) of Representation of the People Act, 1951
- 2 Whether improper acceptance of nomination materially affected the election result
Ratio Decidendi
The copy of the relevant entries from the electoral roll was defective, but the defect was not of a substantial character as the details for identifying the appellant as an elector were furnished, and no objection was raised at the scrutiny. The returning officer acted correctly in not rejecting the nomination paper, and the election was not materially affected by the defect.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside
- Election petition of Mohinder Singh rejected
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment