HARI NARAIN versus BADRI DAS

HARI NARAIN versus BADRI DAS

Special leave granted to the appellant should be revoked as the petition contained inaccurate and untrue statements of material facts which could have influenced the grant of special leave, thereby amounting to a serious infirmity that justifies revocation.

Parties
Appellant: Hari Narain; Respondent: Badri Das
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
04 March 1963
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal No. 14 of 1963 / Appeal From Rajasthan High Court, Judgment Dated July 30, 1962 in Civil Regular S.a. No. 223 of 1961; Consideration of Application for Revocation of Special Leave
Outcome
Special leave revoked; appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Revocation of Special Leave, Misrepresentation in Court Pleadings, Ejectment, Rent Control
Civil Law Landlord and Tenant Revocation of Special Leave Misrepresentation in Court Pleadings Ejectment Rent Control

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hari Narain

Appellant

Badri Das

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal No. 14 of 1963 / Appeal From Rajasthan High Court, Judgment Dated July 30, 1962 in Civil Regular S.a. No. 223 of 1961; Consideration of Application for Revocation of Special Leave

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether special leave granted to appellant should be revoked on account of inaccurate, untrue, and misleading statements in the petition for special leave

Ratio Decidendi

Special leave granted to the appellant should be revoked as the petition contained inaccurate and untrue statements of material facts which could have influenced the grant of special leave, thereby amounting to a serious infirmity that justifies revocation.

Court Disposition

Special leave revoked; appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Special leave is revoked.
  • Appeal is dismissed.