HARI STEEL AND GENERAL INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR. versus DALJIT SINGH & ORS.
Division Bench of the High Court erred in treating admissions as categorical and unconditional for delivering judgment under Order XII Rule 6 CPC; with serious factual disputes and defence, disposal on admissions is unjustified. Specific performance relief cannot be granted without clear pleading and proof of readiness and willingness.
- Parties
- Appellant: HARI STEEL AND GENERAL INDUSTRIES LTD.; Respondent: DALJIT SINGH
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Division Bench Order of High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Division Bench judgment of High Court set aside; Single Judge's order restored; application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC dismissed; refund of balance consideration if deposited by respondent-plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Judgment on Admission, Specific Performance, Readiness and Willingness, Order XII Rule 6
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HARI STEEL AND GENERAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
Appellant
DALJIT SINGH
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Division Bench Order of High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the admissions in the pleadings are categorical and unconditional to deliver judgment under Order XII Rule 6 CPC
- 2 Whether the suit for specific performance can be decreed on admissions when serious factual disputes exist
- 3 Whether readiness and willingness were properly pleaded and proved for specific performance
Ratio Decidendi
Division Bench of the High Court erred in treating admissions as categorical and unconditional for delivering judgment under Order XII Rule 6 CPC; with serious factual disputes and defence, disposal on admissions is unjustified. Specific performance relief cannot be granted without clear pleading and proof of readiness and willingness.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Division Bench judgment of High Court set aside; Single Judge's order restored; application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC dismissed; refund of balance consideration if deposited by respondent-plaintiff.
Orders
- Impugned judgment of Division Bench set aside.
- Single Judge's order restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment