HARIDWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus RAGHUBIR SINGH
As the acquisition is of a comparatively small, compact extent of village land (about 38 bighas), and with no material indicating some areas were less advantageously situated, compensation should be awarded at a uniform rate. The market value must be increased by 12% in view of the one-year gap between sale exemplar and preliminary notification. Interest under section 28 is warranted as the High Court's award resulted in enhancement for some lands.
- Parties
- Appellant: Haridwar Development Authority; Respondent: Raghubir Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeals by Authority dismissed, appeals by claimants allowed
- Legal Topics
- Compensation, Belting Method, Interest, Enhancement of Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Haridwar Development Authority
Appellant
Raghubir Singh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court ought to have adopted the belting method for award of compensation
- 2 Whether the compensation awarded requires to be increased
- 3 Whether the award of interest under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act is sustainable
Ratio Decidendi
As the acquisition is of a comparatively small, compact extent of village land (about 38 bighas), and with no material indicating some areas were less advantageously situated, compensation should be awarded at a uniform rate. The market value must be increased by 12% in view of the one-year gap between sale exemplar and preliminary notification. Interest under section 28 is warranted as the High Court's award resulted in enhancement for some lands.
Court Disposition
Appeals by Authority dismissed, appeals by claimants allowed
Orders
- Compensation increased from Rs.26.25 per sq.ft. to Rs.29.50 per sq.ft.
- Claimants entitled to all statutory benefits: additional amount under section 23(1A), solatium under section 23(2), and interest under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment