HARYANA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD versus SURASTI DEVI
The mother is not eligible for family pension under the Family Pension Scheme as specified in Chapter VI of Punjab Civil Services Rules, since her eligibility is limited under Rule 8.35 only to special circumstances (death due to wounds or extraordinary pensions) covered by Chapter VIII.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Haryana State Electricity Board; Respondent: Surasti Devi
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal Against High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Family Pension Eligibility, Punjab Civil Services Rules Application
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Haryana State Electricity Board
Appellant
Surasti Devi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Decision on Appeal Against High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether mother of deceased employee is entitled to family pension under Punjab Civil Services Rules
Ratio Decidendi
The mother is not eligible for family pension under the Family Pension Scheme as specified in Chapter VI of Punjab Civil Services Rules, since her eligibility is limited under Rule 8.35 only to special circumstances (death due to wounds or extraordinary pensions) covered by Chapter VIII.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Mother is not eligible for family pension under Chapter VI of Punjab Civil Services Rules.
- Mother is entitled to other benefits like G.P.F., leave encashment, etc., as granted by trial court; State is directed to pay entire amounts within six months from receipt of order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment