H.U.D.A versus PREM KUMAR AGARWAL & ANR.
Rate of interest on compensation for alternative plot allotment should be based on current rate rather than a fixed high rate; 12% interest is appropriate under prevailing circumstances.
- Parties
- Appellant: Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA); Respondent: Prem Kumar Agarwal; Respondent: Prem Kumar Agarwal & Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Disposal
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Allotment of Alternative Plot, Rate of Interest on Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA)
Appellant
Prem Kumar Agarwal
Respondent
Prem Kumar Agarwal & Anr.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Disposal
Legal Issues
- 1 What price HUDA is to charge for an alternative plot allotted to an allottee when possession of the originally allotted plot cannot be given for no fault of the allottee?
- 2 Whether the National Consumer Commission was justified in awarding interest at 18% per annum?
Ratio Decidendi
Rate of interest on compensation for alternative plot allotment should be based on current rate rather than a fixed high rate; 12% interest is appropriate under prevailing circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed
Orders
- Rate of interest reduced from 18% to 12% per annum; respondent entitled to 12% interest instead of 18% as fixed by the Commission.
- No costs awarded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment