HETHUBHA ALIAS JITHUBA MADHUBA & ORS. versus THESTATE OF GUJARAT
The Supreme Court held that the third judge under s. 429 CrPC may deal with the entire case, not just the points of difference, and that common intention under s. 34 IPC was established by a pre-arranged plan and participation, so all accused were liable for murder even though the deceased was killed by mistake instead of the intended victim.
- Parties
- Appellant: Hethubha alias Jithuba Madhuba and Ors.; Respondent: State of Gujarat
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 1970
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Section 34 IPC (common Intention), Section 429 Cr PC (procedure on Division of Opinion Among Judges), Mistake in Identity and Criminal Liability, Joint Liability for Murder
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hethubha alias Jithuba Madhuba and Ors.
Appellant
State of Gujarat
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the third judge under s. 429 CrPC can deal with the entire case or only the points of difference?
- 2 Whether common intention under s. 34 IPC can be inferred when the person killed was attacked by mistake instead of the intended victim?
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that the third judge under s. 429 CrPC may deal with the entire case, not just the points of difference, and that common intention under s. 34 IPC was established by a pre-arranged plan and participation, so all accused were liable for murder even though the deceased was killed by mistake instead of the intended victim.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Accused must surrender to bail and serve out the sentences.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment