HINDUSTAN COPPER LIMITED versus M/S. NICCO CORPORATION LTD.
A petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitration award, must be filed before the competent civil court as defined under Section 2(1)(e); a petition and appeal before the High Court lacking ordinary original civil jurisdiction regarding the subject matter are not maintainable. The petition is to be heard by the proper civil court, not the High Court.
- Parties
- Appellant: Hindustan Copper Limited; Respondent: Nicco Corporation Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Before the Supreme Court From Judgment of Jharkhand High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of; orders of High Court modified to the extent indicated.
- Legal Topics
- Maintainability of Petition Under Section 34, Jurisdiction Under Section 2(1)(e), Appeal Under Section 37
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hindustan Copper Limited
Appellant
Nicco Corporation Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Before the Supreme Court From Judgment of Jharkhand High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a petition challenging the arbitration award under Section 34 is maintainable before the High Court or must be filed before the competent civil court as defined under Section 2(1)(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
- 2 Whether an appeal under Section 37 against an order refusing to entertain the Section 34 petition is maintainable
Ratio Decidendi
A petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitration award, must be filed before the competent civil court as defined under Section 2(1)(e); a petition and appeal before the High Court lacking ordinary original civil jurisdiction regarding the subject matter are not maintainable. The petition is to be heard by the proper civil court, not the High Court.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of; orders of High Court modified to the extent indicated.
Orders
- Petition under Section 34 to be listed before District Judge, East Singhbhum, who shall allot it to an appropriate court as per Section 2(1)(e) of the Act.
- Court entrusted by District Judge to dispose of the petition expeditiously, preferably within six months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment