HINDUSTAN STEELWORKS CONSTRUCTION LTD. versus THE COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR AND ORS.
Principal employer is only liable under Section 21(4) to pay contract labourers the difference between the contractual wage agreed with the contractor and the lesser wage actually paid by the contractor in case of default; Section 21(4) does not cover additional amounts payable as per Rule 25(v)(a) of the Andhra Pradesh Contract Labour Rules, which is solely a contractor's obligation.
- Parties
- Appellant: Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd.; Respondents: The Commissioner of Labour and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part. Division Bench directions requiring principal employer to pay additional wages under Rule 25(v)(a) set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Contract Labour, Payment of Wages, Principal Employer Liability, Contractor Obligations, Andhra Pradesh Contract Labour Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd.
Appellant
The Commissioner of Labour and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the principal employer is liable to pay contract workers the difference between wages paid by contractor and those paid by principal employer to own employees doing similar work under Section 21(4) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.
- 2 Whether additional amounts payable under Rule 25(v)(a) of the Andhra Pradesh Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Rules, 1971 fall within the definition of 'wages' under the Act.
Ratio Decidendi
Principal employer is only liable under Section 21(4) to pay contract labourers the difference between the contractual wage agreed with the contractor and the lesser wage actually paid by the contractor in case of default; Section 21(4) does not cover additional amounts payable as per Rule 25(v)(a) of the Andhra Pradesh Contract Labour Rules, which is solely a contractor's obligation.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part. Division Bench directions requiring principal employer to pay additional wages under Rule 25(v)(a) set aside.
Orders
- Principal employer liable only for difference between contractual wage and lesser wage actually paid by contractor, recoverable from contractor.
- Directions requiring payment of additional wages under Rule 25(v)(a) of Andhra Pradesh Contract Labour Rules set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment