HIRA SINGH PAL versus MADAN LAL
The respondent's nomination papers were improperly rejected by the Returning Officer on the basis of clerical errors which could have been easily rectified or verified with the information available. Such improper rejection is not permissible under section 36 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and is a...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Hira Singh Pal; Respondent: Madan Lal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 1968
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision in Election Petition
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rejection of Nomination Papers, Duty of Returning Officer, Clerical Error in Nomination, Grounds for Setting Aside Election
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hira Singh Pal
Appellant
Madan Lal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision in Election Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the rejection of the respondent’s nomination papers was improper under section 36 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and whether such rejection required the setting aside of the election under section 100 of the Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent's nomination papers were improperly rejected by the Returning Officer on the basis of clerical errors which could have been easily rectified or verified with the information available. Such improper rejection is not permissible under section 36 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and is a valid ground to set aside the election under section 100 of the Act.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Election set aside under section 100 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951
- Each party to bear their own costs throughout
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment