CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION versus HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS.
Legislative amendments alone do not suffice for the expeditious adjudication and recovery of debts by Debt Recovery Tribunals; adequate infrastructure, manpower, and resources are essential to the efficacy of the statutory regime.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Centre for Public Interest Litigation; Respondent: Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 January 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) No. 573 of 2003 Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Directions/interim Order
- Outcome
- Union Government directed to file affidavit addressing matters of DRT infrastructure within four weeks; directions issued; no final disposal.
- Legal Topics
- Recovery of Debts, Debt Recovery Tribunals, Infrastructure of Tribunals, Expeditious Adjudication, Enforcement of Security Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Centre for Public Interest Litigation
Petitioner
Housing & Urban Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) No. 573 of 2003 Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Directions/interim Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether legislative changes alone ensure expeditious disposal of proceedings before Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs) without adequate infrastructure?
- 2 What infrastructural measures are required for effective functioning of DRTs and Appellate Tribunals?
Ratio Decidendi
Legislative amendments alone do not suffice for the expeditious adjudication and recovery of debts by Debt Recovery Tribunals; adequate infrastructure, manpower, and resources are essential to the efficacy of the statutory regime.
Court Disposition
Union Government directed to file affidavit addressing matters of DRT infrastructure within four weeks; directions issued; no final disposal.
Orders
- Union Government to file an affidavit within four weeks detailing: (i) whether amended timelines are achievable with current infrastructure and manpower; (ii) whether scientific studies were conducted before stipulating revised timelines; (iii) government's plans to enhance infrastructure, manpower and non-judicial...
- Direction for affidavit filing does not affect functioning of the existing Committee constituted by Union Government.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment