HYDERABAD INDUSTRIES LTD. versus ESI CORPORATION
Matter must be remitted to the High Court for analysis of the factual position and applicability of the Employees State Insurance Act provisions to the concerned categories.
- Parties
- Appellant: Hyderabad Industries Ltd.; Respondent: ESI Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 12.11.1998 of Andhra Pradesh High Court in A.a. Order Nos. 690 696 & 722 of 1994
- Outcome
- Appeals disposed of; matter remitted to High Court for determination on facts; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Employees State Insurance, Definition of Employee, Principal and Immediate Employer, Contract Labour, Coverage Under ESI Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hyderabad Industries Ltd.
Appellant
ESI Corporation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 12.11.1998 of Andhra Pradesh High Court in A.a. Order Nos. 690 696 & 722 of 1994
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether persons engaged by contractors for loading and unloading at railway sidings are employees of contractor or principal employer
- 2 Qualification as insured persons under Section 2(14) of the Act
- 3 Supervision by appellant or its agent over work at railway sidings
Ratio Decidendi
Matter must be remitted to the High Court for analysis of the factual position and applicability of the Employees State Insurance Act provisions to the concerned categories.
Court Disposition
Appeals disposed of; matter remitted to High Court for determination on facts; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Matter remitted to the High Court for factual analysis to determine applicability of the Act
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment