I. LAXMA REDDY versus A.P.S.R.T.C. AND ORS.

I. LAXMA REDDY versus A.P.S.R.T.C. AND ORS.

A simple order of reinstatement with continuity in service does not entitle an employee to notional increments unless there is a specific order to that effect.

Parties
Appellant: I. Laxma Reddy; Respondents: A.P.S.R.T.C. and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
22 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Decision on Appeal From High Court (division Bench) Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Reinstatement, Fixation of Pay, Notional Increments, Continuity of Service
Labour Law Reinstatement Fixation of Pay Notional Increments Continuity of Service

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

I. Laxma Reddy

Appellant

A.P.S.R.T.C. and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Decision on Appeal From High Court (division Bench) Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a simple order of reinstatement without specific mention of consequential benefits entitles an employee to claim notional increments for the period of absence.

Ratio Decidendi

A simple order of reinstatement with continuity in service does not entitle an employee to notional increments unless there is a specific order to that effect.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • There will be no order as to costs.