INAYAT ULLAH versus THE CUSTODIAN, EVACUEE PROPERTY
The Custodian is empowered to issue a notice under section 7 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, on the basis of material and information available to him, and it is not for the Court to assess the adequacy of such information at the stage of issuing notice. The right to copies of the record and evidence arises only after the notice is issued and an enquiry is commenced. Thus, the notice and the refusal to provide copies prior to the enquiry were not illegal.
- Parties
- Appellant: Inayat Ullah; Respondent: The Custodian, Evacuee Property
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 1957
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Order of the Madhya Bharat High Court Rejecting a Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Evacuee Property, Jurisdiction of Custodian, Notice and Procedure Under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, Right to Copies of Documents, Article 226 of the Constitution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Inayat Ullah
Appellant
The Custodian, Evacuee Property
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From the Order of the Madhya Bharat High Court Rejecting a Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notice issued under s. 7 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 was illegal due to lack of proper material or service.
- 2 Whether refusal to supply copies of materials on the basis of which notice was issued under s. 7 of the Act to the appellant was improper or unlawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The Custodian is empowered to issue a notice under section 7 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, on the basis of material and information available to him, and it is not for the Court to assess the adequacy of such information at the stage of issuing notice. The right to copies of the record and evidence arises only after the notice is issued and an enquiry is commenced. Thus, the notice and the refusal to provide copies prior to the enquiry were not illegal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Notice under section 7 of the Act was not illegal.
- Refusal to supply copies of material prior to the enquiry was upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment