INDERJIT C. PAREKH & ORS versus V. K. BHATT & ANR.
Section 4(1)(a)(iv) of the Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 does not grant immunity or stay of proceedings to directors or officers for personal liability incurred before the undertaking was declared a relief undertaking; liability for default in Provident Fund contributions is personal to the directors and officers and prosecution may proceed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Inderjit C. Parekh; Appellant: Appellant 2; Appellant: Appellant 3; Appellant: Appellant 4; Appellant: Appellant 5; Appellant: Appellant 6; Respondent: V. K. Bhati; Respondent: Respondent 2
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 January 1974
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Personal Liability of Directors, Relief Undertakings Act, Stay of Prosecution, Provident Fund Contribution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Inderjit C. Parekh
Appellant
Appellant 2
Appellant
Appellant 3
Appellant
Appellant 4
Appellant
Appellant 5
Appellant
Appellant 6
Appellant
V. K. Bhati
Respondent
Respondent 2
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal by Special Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the personal liability of directors and officers is covered by section 4(1)(a)(iv) of the Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 so as to grant immunity and stay of prosecution for default in payment of Provident Fund contributions.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 4(1)(a)(iv) of the Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1958 does not grant immunity or stay of proceedings to directors or officers for personal liability incurred before the undertaking was declared a relief undertaking; liability for default in Provident Fund contributions is personal to the directors and officers and prosecution may proceed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The prosecution against the appellants shall proceed expeditiously.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment