INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE versus M/S ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND ORS.

INDIAN STATISTICAL INSTITUTE versus M/S ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND ORS.

There was no delay in preferring objections to the arbitration award; delay, if any, was in re-presentation after rectifying defects, not covered by section 5 of Limitation Act; delay caused by advocate's misconduct and circumstances beyond appellant's control constitutes sufficient cause.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Indian Statistical Institute; Respondent: M/s Associated Builders and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
02 December 1977
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave Against the Judgment and Order of Delhi High Court Dated 7 2 77 in Suit No. 574 a of 1976
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Condonation of Delay, Arbitration Award Objection, Advocate Misconduct, Court Fees
Civil Procedure Arbitration Limitation Condonation of Delay Arbitration Award Objection Advocate Misconduct Court Fees

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Indian Statistical Institute

Appellant

M/s Associated Builders and Ors.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave Against the Judgment and Order of Delhi High Court Dated 7 2 77 in Suit No. 574 a of 1976

  1. 1 Whether delay in re-filing objections after rectification of defects is covered under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963
  2. 2 Whether delay due to circumstances beyond litigant's control can be condoned

Ratio Decidendi

There was no delay in preferring objections to the arbitration award; delay, if any, was in re-presentation after rectifying defects, not covered by section 5 of Limitation Act; delay caused by advocate's misconduct and circumstances beyond appellant's control constitutes sufficient cause.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Delay in filing objections condoned
  • Respondents to pay costs of appellant in this Court