INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus TARAK SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
The appellant, though not the claimant, is seeking to avoid the higher compensation awarded by the Reference Court in its appeal, and thus must pay ad valorem court fee under Section 8 of the M.P. Court Fees Act, 1870 on the value of the compensation being challenged. Article 11 of Schedule II does not apply.
- Parties
- Appellant: Indore Development Authority; Respondents: Tarak Singh and Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Disposing Appeal From High Court Order
- Outcome
- Appeals disposed of
- Legal Topics
- Memorandum of Appeal, Ad Valorem Court Fee, Reference Court, Land Acquisition Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Indore Development Authority
Appellant
Tarak Singh and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Disposing Appeal From High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellant-authority is required to pay ad valorem court fee on memorandum of appeal against order granting enhanced compensation under Land Acquisition Act, 1894
- 2 Applicability of Section 8 of Madhya Pradesh Court Fees Act, 1870 to such appeals
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant, though not the claimant, is seeking to avoid the higher compensation awarded by the Reference Court in its appeal, and thus must pay ad valorem court fee under Section 8 of the M.P. Court Fees Act, 1870 on the value of the compensation being challenged. Article 11 of Schedule II does not apply.
Court Disposition
Appeals disposed of
Orders
- Appellants are required to pay ad valorem court fee.
- Two months' time granted to pay deficit court fee.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment