RAJNIKANT JIVANLAL PATEL & ANOTHER versus INTELLIGENCE OFFICER NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU NEW DELHI.

RAJNIKANT JIVANLAL PATEL & ANOTHER versus INTELLIGENCE OFFICER NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU NEW DELHI.

Accused granted bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. cannot claim a special right to remain on bail after charge-sheet is filed; bail can be cancelled if investigation reveals commission of serious offence. High Court's discretion in cancelling bail, considering the gravity of the alleged offences and following Supreme Court precedent, is legally sustainable.

Parties
Petitioner: Rajnikant Jivanlal Patel & Another; Respondent: Intelligence Officer Narcotic Control Bureau New Delhi
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
26 June 1989
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (criminal) / Appeal From Delhi High Court Order Cancelling Bail
Outcome
Petitions dismissed
Legal Topics
Bail, Charge Sheet Delay, Cancellation of Bail, Section 167(2) Cr.p.c., Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rajnikant Jivanlal Patel & Another

Petitioner

Intelligence Officer Narcotic Control Bureau New Delhi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (criminal) / Appeal From Delhi High Court Order Cancelling Bail

  1. 1 Whether High Court's discretion in cancelling bail granted under proviso (a) to Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. is legally sustainable
  2. 2 Whether accused have a special right to remain on bail merely because bail was granted under default provisions

Ratio Decidendi

Accused granted bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. cannot claim a special right to remain on bail after charge-sheet is filed; bail can be cancelled if investigation reveals commission of serious offence. High Court's discretion in cancelling bail, considering the gravity of the alleged offences and following Supreme Court precedent, is legally sustainable.

Court Disposition

Petitions dismissed

Orders

  • Special Leave Petitions rejected.