ISHWAR SINGH versus SATBIR SINGH & ORS.

ISHWAR SINGH versus SATBIR SINGH & ORS.

The High Court erred in overlooking the Financial Commissioner's finding that the Collector's order was perverse and illegal. The High Court must give cogent and convincing reasons for interfering with such orders. The matter is remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration.

Parties
Appellant: Ishwar Singh; Respondent: Satbir Singh
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
17 August 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Appointment of Lambardar, Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions
Service Law Revenue Law Appointment of Lambardar Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ishwar Singh

Appellant

Satbir Singh

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the orders of the Financial Commissioner and Commissioner regarding the appointment of Lambardar
  2. 2 Whether interference with the Collector’s choice was permissible without cogent reasons

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court erred in overlooking the Financial Commissioner's finding that the Collector's order was perverse and illegal. The High Court must give cogent and convincing reasons for interfering with such orders. The matter is remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • High Court's judgment dated April 11, 2008 set aside
  • Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1672 of 2008 restored to High Court for fresh consideration