J. JOSE DHANAPAUL versus S. THOMAS AND ORS.

J. JOSE DHANAPAUL versus S. THOMAS AND ORS.

The Tribunal committed a grave error of law by annulling the appointment of the appellant without him being impleaded as a party; therefore, the impugned order is set aside as regards the appellant.

Parties
Appellant: J. Jose Dhanapaul; Respondent: S. Thomas
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
16 February 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Order
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Appointment Annulment, Impleading Parties, Tribunal Error, Practice and Procedure
Service Law Appointment Annulment Impleading Parties Tribunal Error Practice and Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

J. Jose Dhanapaul

Appellant

S. Thomas

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in annulling appointment without impleading the affected person as a party

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal committed a grave error of law by annulling the appointment of the appellant without him being impleaded as a party; therefore, the impugned order is set aside as regards the appellant.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The impugned order dated June 15, 1993 is set aside as regards the appellant.
  • No costs.