JATINDER SINGH versus RANJIT KAUR

JATINDER SINGH versus RANJIT KAUR

A second complaint is maintainable if the first complaint was dismissed for default and not on merits; the Code of Criminal Procedure and relevant case law do not prohibit such a second complaint unless the prior dismissal was on the merits of the case.

Parties
Appellant: JA TINDER SINGH; Respondent: RANJIT KAUR
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
30 January 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Punjab and Haryana High Court in Crl. R. No.1141 of 1999
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Bigamy, Abetment, Dismissal of Complaint, Second Complaint, Code of Criminal Procedure Sections 202, 203, 300
Criminal Law Bigamy Abetment Dismissal of Complaint Second Complaint Code of Criminal Procedure Sections 202, 203, 300

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JA TINDER SINGH

Appellant

RANJIT KAUR

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Punjab and Haryana High Court in Crl. R. No.1141 of 1999

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a second complaint on the same allegations is maintainable when the first was dismissed for default and not on merits

Ratio Decidendi

A second complaint is maintainable if the first complaint was dismissed for default and not on merits; the Code of Criminal Procedure and relevant case law do not prohibit such a second complaint unless the prior dismissal was on the merits of the case.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The complaint and proceedings initiated thereon before the Magistrate are restored.