JAGDISH DUTT AND ANR. versus DHARAM PAL AND ORS.

JAGDISH DUTT AND ANR. versus DHARAM PAL AND ORS.

Execution of a decree for actual possession in favour of a joint Hindu family is limited if a coparcener has assigned his undivided interest to the judgment debtor; only the unassigned portion can be executed, and actual possession is barred until rights are ascertained by partition if interests are undefined. The High Court correctly remitted the matter to determine the quantum of share purchased.

Parties
Appellant: Jagdish Dutt and Anr.; Respondent: Dharam Pal and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
12 April 1999
Procedural Posture
Special Leave Petition (civil) / Appeal Against High Court Order Remitting Execution Matter
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Execution of Decrees, Joint Family Property, Transfer of Undivided Interest, Partition, Ejectment, Tenancy and Lease
Civil Procedure Property Law Hindu Law Execution of Decrees Joint Family Property Transfer of Undivided Interest Partition Ejectment +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jagdish Dutt and Anr.

Appellant

Dharam Pal and Ors.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Special Leave Petition (civil) / Appeal Against High Court Order Remitting Execution Matter

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether execution of a decree for ejectment in favour of a joint Hindu family is affected by transfer of undivided interest by a coparcener to judgment debtor
  2. 2 Whether actual physical possession can be given when a coparcener's interest has been transferred and is undefined
  3. 3 Whether the judgment debtor must surrender possession and seek remedy separately after acquiring title

Ratio Decidendi

Execution of a decree for actual possession in favour of a joint Hindu family is limited if a coparcener has assigned his undivided interest to the judgment debtor; only the unassigned portion can be executed, and actual possession is barred until rights are ascertained by partition if interests are undefined. The High Court correctly remitted the matter to determine the quantum of share purchased.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Special leave petitions dismissed
  • No order as to costs