SMT. RAM PYARI & ORS. versus JAGDISH LAL

SMT. RAM PYARI & ORS. versus JAGDISH LAL

Though respondents could not be found guilty of violating any specific undertaking as there was none, the Supreme Court should ensure compliance with its prior order and direct delivery of possession in the interest of justice.

Parties
Petitioner: Ram Pyari; Respondent: Jagdish
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
05 December 1991
Procedural Posture
Contempt Petition / Final Disposition
Outcome
petition disposed of
Legal Topics
Possession of Premises, Contempt of Court
Civil Law Possession of Premises Contempt of Court

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ram Pyari

Petitioner

Jagdish

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Contempt Petition / Final Disposition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent is guilty of contempt for not complying with court's directions regarding possession, rent, and undertaking

Ratio Decidendi

Though respondents could not be found guilty of violating any specific undertaking as there was none, the Supreme Court should ensure compliance with its prior order and direct delivery of possession in the interest of justice.

Court Disposition

petition disposed of

Orders

  • Direct learned Additional Munsif of Shahjahanpur to cause delivery of vacant possession of Shop No. 289 situate in Bazar Bahadurganj, Shahjahanpur under City Board Shahjahanpur to the applicants, if necessary with police help, on or before 15th December, 1991.
  • Learned Munsif is directed to report compliance immediately.