SHRI JAGDISH SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

SHRI JAGDISH SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

The compensation awarded for the land and house was based on concurrent findings of fact and appreciation of evidence by the Reference Court and High Court, and Supreme Court will not interfere in the absence of application of any wrong principle of law.

Parties
Appellant: Jagdish Singh; Respondents: State of Haryana and Ors.; Respondent: Respondent No. 3
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
01 November 1995
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Before Supreme Court After High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Compensation for Acquired Land, Appreciation of Evidence, Special Leave Jurisdiction
Land Acquisition Constitutional Law Compensation for Acquired Land Appreciation of Evidence Special Leave Jurisdiction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jagdish Singh

Appellant

State of Haryana and Ors.

Respondents

Respondent No. 3

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Before Supreme Court After High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to higher compensation for acquired land and constructed house

Ratio Decidendi

The compensation awarded for the land and house was based on concurrent findings of fact and appreciation of evidence by the Reference Court and High Court, and Supreme Court will not interfere in the absence of application of any wrong principle of law.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed without costs