JAGTAR SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA

JAGTAR SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA

The conviction and five-year sentence under Section 304 Part II read with Section 34 IPC were upheld because the ocular evidence consistently proved that the appellant was the aggressor who pulled the deceased to the ground and struck his head causing injuries that resulted in death, and sufficient motive was proved...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Jagtar Singh; Respondent: State of Haryana; Co Accused: Ajaib Singh
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
19 June 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence of appellant under Section 304 Part II read with Section 34 IPC upheld
Legal Topics
Homicide, Section 304 Part II IPC, Motive, Eyewitness Testimony, Sentence
Criminal Law Evidence Indian Penal Code Homicide Section 304 Part II IPC Motive Eyewitness Testimony Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jagtar Singh

Appellant

State of Haryana

Respondent

Ajaib Singh

Co Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant committed the act causing death and is guilty under Section 304 Part II read with Section 34 IPC
  2. 2 Whether motive existed prior to the commission of the crime
  3. 3 Reliability of eyewitness testimony

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction and five-year sentence under Section 304 Part II read with Section 34 IPC were upheld because the ocular evidence consistently proved that the appellant was the aggressor who pulled the deceased to the ground and struck his head causing injuries that resulted in death, and sufficient motive was proved by ocular and documentary evidence; the co-accused's acquittal stood on lack of evidence against him.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence of appellant under Section 304 Part II read with Section 34 IPC upheld

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed and conviction and sentence of appellant upheld
  • Appellant directed to undergo remaining period of sentence