JAI PRAKASH SHARMA versus STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

JAI PRAKASH SHARMA versus STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

Since the appellant had not completed the requisite four years' experience as Headmaster to be eligible for the post, selection of respondent by the committee was correct in law.

Parties
Appellant: Jai Prakash Sharma; Respondents: State of U.P. and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
20 March 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal From Allahabad High Court Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appointment of Headmaster, Qualification Requirements, Direct Recruitment, Promotion, Experience Criterion
Service Law Appointment of Headmaster Qualification Requirements Direct Recruitment Promotion Experience Criterion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jai Prakash Sharma

Appellant

State of U.P. and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal From Allahabad High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was eligible for appointment as Headmaster based on experience
  2. 2 Whether selection of respondent as Headmaster was valid under U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 and Rules

Ratio Decidendi

Since the appellant had not completed the requisite four years' experience as Headmaster to be eligible for the post, selection of respondent by the committee was correct in law.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal fails and is dismissed. No costs.