JAI SINGH versus SHAKUNTALA

JAI SINGH versus SHAKUNTALA

The statutory presumption under Section 16 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 is a rebuttable presumption, not irrebuttable, due to the inclusion of 'unless and until it is disproved'. In the instant case, the absence of evidence of specific adoption ceremonies and contradictory documents and statements sufficiently rebutted the presumption in favour of adoption. The courts below properly appreciated the evidence and there is no perversity warranting Supreme Court interference.

Parties
Appellant: Jai Singh; Respondent: Shakuntala
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
14 March 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Punjab and Haryana High Court Judgment Dated 5.2.96
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Adoption, Statutory Presumption, Rebuttable Presumption, Succession
Family Law Property Law Adoption Statutory Presumption Rebuttable Presumption Succession

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jai Singh

Appellant

Shakuntala

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Punjab and Haryana High Court Judgment Dated 5.2.96

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether statutory presumption under Section 16 of Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 is irrebuttable or rebuttable for registered adoption documents
  2. 2 Whether the evidence was sufficient to rebut the presumption of adoption in this case
  3. 3 Scope of reappreciation of evidence under Article 136 of the Constitution

Ratio Decidendi

The statutory presumption under Section 16 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 is a rebuttable presumption, not irrebuttable, due to the inclusion of 'unless and until it is disproved'. In the instant case, the absence of evidence of specific adoption ceremonies and contradictory documents and statements sufficiently rebutted the presumption in favour of adoption. The courts below properly appreciated the evidence and there is no perversity warranting Supreme Court interference.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal stands dismissed without any order as to costs.