JAKKI @ SELVARAJ AND ANR. versus STATE REP. BY THE IP, COIMBATORE
Conviction of two appellants justified on basis of credible evidence of PW-13, corroborated by medical evidence, notwithstanding acquittal of other accused. Testimony can be partly relied on; maxim of falsus in uno falsus in omnibus does not apply in India.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jakki@ Selvaraj and another; Respondent: State Rep. by the JP, Coimbatore
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; conviction of appellants upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Credibility of Witnesses, Falsus in Uno Falsus in Omnibus, Sections 148 and 302 IPC, Oral Evidence Discrepancies
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jakki@ Selvaraj and another
Appellant
State Rep. by the JP, Coimbatore
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conviction of appellants based on evidence of sole eyewitness (PW-13) is sustainable even when other accused are acquitted
- 2 Applicability of falsus in uno falsus in omnibus to Indian criminal trials
- 3 Effect of discrepancies in oral evidence on prosecution case
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction of two appellants justified on basis of credible evidence of PW-13, corroborated by medical evidence, notwithstanding acquittal of other accused. Testimony can be partly relied on; maxim of falsus in uno falsus in omnibus does not apply in India.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; conviction of appellants upheld.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Conviction of appellants for offences under sections 148 and 302 IPC confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment