JAMEEL versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Conviction is sustainable as prosecutrix, a minor, identified the accused in Court and before FIR, medical evidence corroborates prosecution case; test identification parade is not required where accused is known; Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 is not applicable since accused was above eighteen years on 01.04.2001.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jameel; Respondent: State of Maharashtra
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appeal Before Supreme Court Challenging Conviction and Sentence by Sessions Court, Affirmed by Bombay High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rape of Minor, Identification Parade, Juvenile Justice Act Applicability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jameel
Appellant
State of Maharashtra
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appeal Before Supreme Court Challenging Conviction and Sentence by Sessions Court, Affirmed by Bombay High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conviction under ss. 363, 376 r/w 511 and 377 IPC was sustainable
- 2 Whether holding a test identification parade was necessary
- 3 Whether Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 applied
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction is sustainable as prosecutrix, a minor, identified the accused in Court and before FIR, medical evidence corroborates prosecution case; test identification parade is not required where accused is known; Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 is not applicable since accused was above eighteen years on 01.04.2001.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Conviction and sentence under ss. 363, 376 r/w 511, and 377 IPC affirmed
- No relief under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment