JAMMU & KASHMIR STATE FOREST CORPORATION versus ABDUL KARIM WANI

JAMMU & KASHMIR STATE FOREST CORPORATION versus ABDUL KARIM WANI

The respondent's claim was not covered by the arbitration clause, as it was based on alleged custom, practice, or assurance and not arising from the written contract; High Court's order referring the dispute to arbitration and granting mandatory interim relief was set aside; interim orders cannot be used to grant disputed substantive rights prior to final adjudication.

Parties
Appellant: Jammu & Kashmir State Forest Corporation; Respondent: Abdul Karim Wan
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
31 March 1989
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Adjudication After High Court Reference and Interim Order
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court's reference to arbitration and interim mandatory relief set aside.
Legal Topics
Arbitration Clause Construction, Scope of Arbitration Agreement, Court Interim Powers During Arbitration, Entitlement to Additional Work Under Contract, Custom and Practice in Contracting
Arbitration Contract Civil Procedure Arbitration Clause Construction Scope of Arbitration Agreement Court Interim Powers During Arbitration Entitlement to Additional Work Under Contract Custom and Practice in Contracting

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jammu & Kashmir State Forest Corporation

Appellant

Abdul Karim Wan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Adjudication After High Court Reference and Interim Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether claim for additional work was referable to arbitration under contract
  2. 2 Whether High Court had jurisdiction to grant interim mandatory relief for execution of disputed contract
  3. 3 Whether respondent entitled to remuneration for work done under interim order

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent's claim was not covered by the arbitration clause, as it was based on alleged custom, practice, or assurance and not arising from the written contract; High Court's order referring the dispute to arbitration and granting mandatory interim relief was set aside; interim orders cannot be used to grant disputed substantive rights prior to final adjudication.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court's reference to arbitration and interim mandatory relief set aside.

Orders

  • Reference to arbitration set aside.
  • Interim mandatory direction permitting execution of remaining work set aside.