JANAK DULARI DEVI & ANR. versus KAPILDEO RAI & ANR.
When parties intend that title transfers only upon full payment of consideration, and both possession and the registration receipt are retained pending such payment (as per 'ta khubzul badlain' in Bihar), execution and registration of a sale deed do not, by themselves, pass title; without such payment and delivery, the vendor retains title and can lawfully repudiate the sale. Hence, where no consideration was paid by the appellants and possession was not delivered, and the sale was repudiated before payment, no title passed to the appellants, and the subsequent sale was valid.
- Parties
- Appellant: Janak Dulari Devi; Respondent: Kapildeo Rai
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against High Court Decision in Second Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Property, Sale of Immovable Property, Specific Performance, Passing of Title, Registration of Sale Deed, Practice in Bihar ('ta Khubzul Badlain')
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Janak Dulari Devi
Appellant
Kapildeo Rai
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against High Court Decision in Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether title to immovable property passes to the purchaser upon execution and registration of the sale deed when consideration is not paid according to the intention of the parties, particularly with regard to the practice of 'ta khubzul badlain' in Bihar.
- 2 Whether the purchaser is entitled to specific performance and delivery of registration receipt and possession when consideration remains unpaid.
Ratio Decidendi
When parties intend that title transfers only upon full payment of consideration, and both possession and the registration receipt are retained pending such payment (as per 'ta khubzul badlain' in Bihar), execution and registration of a sale deed do not, by themselves, pass title; without such payment and delivery, the vendor retains title and can lawfully repudiate the sale. Hence, where no consideration was paid by the appellants and possession was not delivered, and the sale was repudiated before payment, no title passed to the appellants, and the subsequent sale was valid.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- No title passed to the appellants through the deed in their favour as consideration was not paid; after lawful repudiation by the vendor, appellants not entitled to performance.
- Subsequent sale in favour of first respondent is valid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment