JASBIR SINGH versus VIPIN KUMAR JAGGI AND ORS.
There is nothing in Section 64 of the NDPS Act to circumscribe the power of the Government to a time prior to commencement of trial; the power may be exercised at any time during the course of trial but before judgment is delivered, and the grant of immunity from prosecution under Section 64 is valid even after rejection of application under Section 307 Cr.P.C.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jasbir Singh; Respondent No. 1: Vipin Kumar Jaggi; Respondents: Vipin Kumar Jaggi and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From Delhi High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Immunity From Prosecution, Grant of Pardon, Interpretation of Statutes, Conflict Between Special and General Statutes, Power Under Section 64 NDPS Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jasbir Singh
Appellant
Vipin Kumar Jaggi
Respondent No. 1
Vipin Kumar Jaggi and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From Delhi High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Central or State Government may exercise power under Section 64 of the NDPS Act to grant immunity from prosecution after rejection of an application under Section 307 Cr.P.C.
- 2 Whether the Governmental power under Section 64 NDPS Act is limited to before commencement of trial or may be exercised during trial before judgment is delivered
Ratio Decidendi
There is nothing in Section 64 of the NDPS Act to circumscribe the power of the Government to a time prior to commencement of trial; the power may be exercised at any time during the course of trial but before judgment is delivered, and the grant of immunity from prosecution under Section 64 is valid even after rejection of application under Section 307 Cr.P.C.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The order of the High Court and the Government granting immunity to respondent No. 1 is upheld.
- The respondent No. 1 retains immunity from prosecution under Section 64 of the NDPS Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment