JAYARAM MUDALIAR versus AYYASWAMI & ORS.
Rule 28 of Order IV is valid and does not curtail appeal rights. Doctrine of lis pendens applies to voluntary sales but not to revenue sales if statutory charge exists and loan was for improvement of specified properties; such properties are to be segregated from the joint family partition proceedings.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jayaram Mudaliar; Respondent: Ayyaswami Mudaliar; Co Defendants: Munisami Mudaliar and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 1972
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Madras High Court Second Appeal No. 1173 of 1964
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Doctrine of Lis Pendens, Partition Suit, Validity of Sales During Pendency of Suit, Effect of Limitation Act and High Court Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jayaram Mudaliar
Appellant
Ayyaswami Mudaliar
Respondent
Munisami Mudaliar and others
Co Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Madras High Court Second Appeal No. 1173 of 1964
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Rule 28 Order IV of Madras High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1965 is ultra vires
- 2 Applicability of doctrine of lis pendens under s. 52 of Transfer of Property Act to voluntary and revenue sales during pendency of partition suit
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 28 of Order IV is valid and does not curtail appeal rights. Doctrine of lis pendens applies to voluntary sales but not to revenue sales if statutory charge exists and loan was for improvement of specified properties; such properties are to be segregated from the joint family partition proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Trial court to determine which properties were improved by loans under Land Improvement Loans Act, and segregate them from other suit properties for partition.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment