JAYASINGH versus K.K. VELAYUTHAM AND ANR.

JAYASINGH versus K.K. VELAYUTHAM AND ANR.

The appellant, a government servant, removed the tea stall pursuant to an official order executing government policy and did not act outside the scope of his duty; no sanction for prosecution was obtained as required under Section 197 Cr.P.C.; the charge-sheet does not disclose a criminal offence under Section 427 IPC against the appellant.

Parties
Appellant: Jayasingh; Respondent No. 1: K.K. Vela Yutham; Respondent/prosecution: State of Tamil Nadu
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
25 April 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Disposition of Appeal Against High Court Revision Order
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Section 427 Indian Penal Code, Section 197 Criminal Procedure Code, Requirement of Sanction for Prosecution, Official Duty and Criminal Liability, Government Policy to Remove Kiosks

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jayasingh

Appellant

K.K. Vela Yutham

Respondent No. 1

State of Tamil Nadu

Respondent/prosecution

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Disposition of Appeal Against High Court Revision Order

  1. 1 Whether prosecution against the accused was maintainable without obtaining sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C.
  2. 2 Whether the accused committed an offence under Section 427 IPC by removing the tea stall in compliance with a government order

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant, a government servant, removed the tea stall pursuant to an official order executing government policy and did not act outside the scope of his duty; no sanction for prosecution was obtained as required under Section 197 Cr.P.C.; the charge-sheet does not disclose a criminal offence under Section 427 IPC against the appellant.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • High Court order set aside
  • Order of discharge by Metropolitan Magistrate restored