JAYKUMAR GANPATI WAIKAR versus NIVRITTI SAKHARAM TITWE AND ORS.

JAYKUMAR GANPATI WAIKAR versus NIVRITTI SAKHARAM TITWE AND ORS.

The tenant validly exercised the option to purchase land under Section 32F of the Act by issuing notice within one month after the appellant landlord attained majority; there is no illegality in the High Court's conclusion granting the benefit of purchase to the tenant.

Parties
Appellant: Jaykumar Ganpati Waikar; Respondents: Nivritti Sakharm Titwe and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
17 September 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Bombay High Court Judgment Dated 23.11.1978 in Special Civil Application No. 2589 of 1974
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Ejectment of Tenant, Option to Purchase Land, Disability Under Tenancy Statutes
Tenancy Law Ejectment of Tenant Option to Purchase Land Disability Under Tenancy Statutes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jaykumar Ganpati Waikar

Appellant

Nivritti Sakharm Titwe and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Bombay High Court Judgment Dated 23.11.1978 in Special Civil Application No. 2589 of 1974

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the tenant exercised his right to purchase under Section 32F of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 within the stipulated period

Ratio Decidendi

The tenant validly exercised the option to purchase land under Section 32F of the Act by issuing notice within one month after the appellant landlord attained majority; there is no illegality in the High Court's conclusion granting the benefit of purchase to the tenant.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs