JENANY J.R. versus S. RAJEEVAN & ORS.
The relevant date for possessing the prescribed qualification under Rule 43 Note 2 of Kerala Education Rules, 1959 is the date when the vacancy occurs, not the date of actual appointment or joining; as respondent No.1 was not qualified on that date, the appellant's appointment was valid.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jenany J.R.; Respondent No.1: S. Rajeevan; Respondents: Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench of High Court of Kerala Decision in W.a. No. 2425 of 2005
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Division Bench High Court order set aside; Order of Single Judge restored.
- Legal Topics
- Kerala Education Rules 1959 – Rule 43 Note 2, Prescribed Qualification Date for Appointment, Promotion in School Education Service
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jenany J.R.
Appellant
S. Rajeevan
Respondent No.1
Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Division Bench of High Court of Kerala Decision in W.a. No. 2425 of 2005
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the relevant date for possessing the prescribed qualification for promotion under Kerala Education Rules, 1959, Rule 43 Note 2 is the date of occurrence of vacancy or the date of appointment.
Ratio Decidendi
The relevant date for possessing the prescribed qualification under Rule 43 Note 2 of Kerala Education Rules, 1959 is the date when the vacancy occurs, not the date of actual appointment or joining; as respondent No.1 was not qualified on that date, the appellant's appointment was valid.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Division Bench High Court order set aside; Order of Single Judge restored.
Orders
- Division Bench order dated 6.8.2008 in W.A. No. 2425 of 2005 set aside and quashed.
- Order of learned Single Judge restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment