JITENDRA KUMAR & ORS. versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

JITENDRA KUMAR & ORS. versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

No interference warranted as the State’s reduction in cadre strength and refusal to appoint selectees pending vigilance enquiry is neither malafide, arbitrary, nor unfair; selectees have no enforceable legal right to appointment except subject to bona fide action of the State, especially given allegations regarding...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Jitendra Kumar & Ors.; Respondent: State of Haryana & Anr.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
11 December 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment After Appeal From High Court
Outcome
appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Appointment, Recruitment, Judicial Review, Legitimate Expectation, Promissory Estoppel, Proportionality, Policy Decision, Cadre Strength, Selection Process, Vigilance Enquiry
Service Law Administrative Law Constitutional Law Appointment Recruitment Judicial Review Legitimate Expectation Promissory Estoppel +5 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jitendra Kumar & Ors.

Appellant

State of Haryana & Anr.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Judgment After Appeal From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether State's refusal to issue appointment letters to selected candidates due to reduction of cadre strength and pending vigilance enquiry is arbitrary or malafide
  2. 2 Whether selectees have a legal right to appointment subject to the State's bona fide action
  3. 3 Applicability of doctrines of legitimate expectation, promissory estoppel, unreasonableness, and proportionality in public appointments

Ratio Decidendi

No interference warranted as the State’s reduction in cadre strength and refusal to appoint selectees pending vigilance enquiry is neither malafide, arbitrary, nor unfair; selectees have no enforceable legal right to appointment except subject to bona fide action of the State, especially given allegations regarding the selection process and statutory limitation on appointments.

Court Disposition

appeals dismissed

Orders

  • State Government directed to expedite vigilance enquiry and take all required steps
  • Haryana Public Service Commission requested to cooperate fully with State Vigilance Bureau