JIVENDRA NATH KAUL ETC. versus THE COLLECTOR/DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND ANR ETC.
'For the time being' in Section 28(11) of the Act refers to the actual members of the Zilla Parishad in existence on the date of the no confidence motion. Since out of 60 lawful members, 31 voted in favour, the motion was rightly carried by more than half of the total number of members for the time being.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jivendra Nath Kaul; Respondents: The Collector/District Magistrate and Anr
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment of High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- No Confidence Motion, Disqualification of Members, Interpretation of 'for the Time Being'
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jivendra Nath Kaul
Appellant
The Collector/District Magistrate and Anr
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment of High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'for the time being' in Section 28(11) of U.P. Kehhetra Samiti and Zilla Parishad Adhiniyam, 1961 refers to actual membership on date of no confidence motion
- 2 Whether the motion of no confidence was carried by required majority after excluding disqualified nominated members
Ratio Decidendi
'For the time being' in Section 28(11) of the Act refers to the actual members of the Zilla Parishad in existence on the date of the no confidence motion. Since out of 60 lawful members, 31 voted in favour, the motion was rightly carried by more than half of the total number of members for the time being.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment