JOSE PHILIP MAMPILLIL versus M/S. PREMIER AUTOMOBILES LTD. AND ANR.
The Supreme Court held that since defects were proved to be present at the time of delivery, the consumer is entitled to have the car repaired from any reputed garage or mechanic of their choice at the cost of the respondents, with liability joint and several.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jose Philip Mampillil; 1st Respondent: Premier Automobiles Ltd.; 2nd Respondent: Premier Automobiles Ltd. Dealer (Kottayam)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of.
- Legal Topics
- Defective Goods, Consumer Rights, Remedies for Defective Vehicles
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jose Philip Mampillil
Appellant
Premier Automobiles Ltd.
1st Respondent
Premier Automobiles Ltd. Dealer (Kottayam)
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defects in the appellant's car existed at delivery and the appropriate remedies for the consumer
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that since defects were proved to be present at the time of delivery, the consumer is entitled to have the car repaired from any reputed garage or mechanic of their choice at the cost of the respondents, with liability joint and several.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of.
Orders
- Appellant may get the car repaired from any reputed garage/mechanic at Kottayam of their choice, with notice to respondents before and after repair.
- Respondents to pay jointly and severally for all repair costs; not permitted to dispute nature of repairs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment