K. BALARAMAN versus CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD AND ORS.
Advance increments granted to Stock Verifiers for passing the prescribed examination are not to be included in basic pay and do not qualify for Dearness Allowance or pensionary benefits. The High Court correctly set aside the Tribunal's contrary decision.
- Parties
- Appellant: K. Balaraman; Respondents: Chairman, Railway Board and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From High Court Decision Affirming Order in Original Application From Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Advance Increments, Basic Pay, Dearness Allowance, Promotion and Confirmation, Incentives for Examinations, Central Administrative Tribunal Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K. Balaraman
Appellant
Chairman, Railway Board and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From High Court Decision Affirming Order in Original Application From Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether advance increments granted to Stock Verifiers for passing the prescribed examination should be treated as part of basic pay or as a separate element not reckoned for Dearness Allowance, etc.
Ratio Decidendi
Advance increments granted to Stock Verifiers for passing the prescribed examination are not to be included in basic pay and do not qualify for Dearness Allowance or pensionary benefits. The High Court correctly set aside the Tribunal's contrary decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- No infirmity in High Court’s judgment.
- Parties to bear their own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment