K. C. NAMBIAR versus THE IV JUDGE OF THE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MADRAS & ORS.
The expression 'cost of construction' in s. 4(3)(b)(i) of the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 denotes the original cost of construction and not the market value; rules prescribing rates for calculation that go beyond the section's terms are invalid.
- Parties
- Appellant: K. C. Nambiar; Respondents: The IV Judge of the Court of Small Causes, Madras & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 1969
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Decision by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of 'cost of Construction' Under Madras Buildings (lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, Validity of Rules for Rent Fixation, Delegation of Rule Making Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K. C. Nambiar
Appellant
The IV Judge of the Court of Small Causes, Madras & Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Decision by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Does 'cost of construction' under s. 4(3)(b)(i) mean the original cost or market value at the date of enactment?
- 2 Are the rules prescribing rates for construction cost valid under the Act?
Ratio Decidendi
The expression 'cost of construction' in s. 4(3)(b)(i) of the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 denotes the original cost of construction and not the market value; rules prescribing rates for calculation that go beyond the section's terms are invalid.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order dismissing the petition is discharged
- The Controller to determine fair rent according to provisions of the Act, uninfluenced by rule 12
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment