K. DEVAKIMMA & ORS. versus TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS & ANR.
Reference Courts rightly relied on rates determined in prior years for adjacent lands and applied appropriate escalation due to absence of sale deed evidence, and all appellants' lands were of similar nature; compensation should be uniformly fixed at Rs.90 per sq. ft., not Rs.30/- as reduced by the High Court. Compensation for superstructures upheld.
- Parties
- Appellant: K. Devakimma & Ors.; Respondent: Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams & Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Determination by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Market Value Determination, Escalation in Land Value, Compensation for Superstructures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K. Devakimma & Ors.
Appellant
Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams & Anr.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Determination by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court was justified in reducing the compensation for acquired lands from the rate fixed by the Reference Court to Rs.30/- per sq. ft.
- 2 What is the appropriate market value per square foot for compensation under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in absence of contemporaneous sale evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Reference Courts rightly relied on rates determined in prior years for adjacent lands and applied appropriate escalation due to absence of sale deed evidence, and all appellants' lands were of similar nature; compensation should be uniformly fixed at Rs.90 per sq. ft., not Rs.30/- as reduced by the High Court. Compensation for superstructures upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal partly allowed
Orders
- Judgment/order of the High Court is set aside; awards of the Reference Court restored with modification that compensation is to be fixed uniformly at Rs.90 per sq. ft. for the acquired lands of all appellants.
- Compensation for superstructures awarded by Reference Court is upheld; no interference warranted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment