KABIDI VENKU SAH versus SYED ABDUL HAI AND OTHERS

KABIDI VENKU SAH versus SYED ABDUL HAI AND OTHERS

A simple mortgagee, having no interest in the equity of redemption and not enjoying possession on the date of attachment, is not a competent person to file a claim petition under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC objecting to the attachment of the equity of redemption.

Parties
Appellant: Kabidi Venku Sah; Respondent: Syed Abdul Hai; Respondent: Sharada Bai; Third Party: Vittal Sah
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
28 September 1983
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From High Court Judgment in Civil Revision Petition
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Attachment Before Judgment, Order 21 Rule 58 CPC, Order 38 Rule 5 CPC, Simple Mortgage, Claim Petition, Equity of Redemption

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kabidi Venku Sah

Appellant

Syed Abdul Hai

Respondent

Sharada Bai

Respondent

Vittal Sah

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From High Court Judgment in Civil Revision Petition

  1. 1 Whether a simple mortgagee without interest in the equity of redemption and not in possession can file a claim petition under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC objecting to attachment of property

Ratio Decidendi

A simple mortgagee, having no interest in the equity of redemption and not enjoying possession on the date of attachment, is not a competent person to file a claim petition under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC objecting to the attachment of the equity of redemption.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal fails and is dismissed without costs