KABIDI VENKU SAH versus SYED ABDUL HAI AND OTHERS
A simple mortgagee, having no interest in the equity of redemption and not enjoying possession on the date of attachment, is not a competent person to file a claim petition under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC objecting to the attachment of the equity of redemption.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kabidi Venku Sah; Respondent: Syed Abdul Hai; Respondent: Sharada Bai; Third Party: Vittal Sah
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From High Court Judgment in Civil Revision Petition
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Attachment Before Judgment, Order 21 Rule 58 CPC, Order 38 Rule 5 CPC, Simple Mortgage, Claim Petition, Equity of Redemption
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kabidi Venku Sah
Appellant
Syed Abdul Hai
Respondent
Sharada Bai
Respondent
Vittal Sah
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From High Court Judgment in Civil Revision Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a simple mortgagee without interest in the equity of redemption and not in possession can file a claim petition under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC objecting to attachment of property
Ratio Decidendi
A simple mortgagee, having no interest in the equity of redemption and not enjoying possession on the date of attachment, is not a competent person to file a claim petition under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC objecting to the attachment of the equity of redemption.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal fails and is dismissed without costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment