KAILASH SONKAR versus SMT. MAYA DEVI
The respondent, though born to Christian parents, had voluntarily reconverted to Hinduism, performed necessary religious and social rites, was accepted by the Katia scheduled caste community, and was thus entitled to claim scheduled caste status under law for the purpose of contesting election from a reserved constituency. The original caste, having been under eclipse due to conversion, revived upon genuine reconversion.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kailash Sonkar; Respondent: Smt. Maya Devi
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Judgment in Election Petition No. 2 of 1980
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Scheduled Castes—status After Conversion and Reconversion, Disqualification to Contest Reserved Seats Under Representation of the People Act, Doctrine of 'eclipse' and Caste Revival, Religious Conversion and Its Effect on Caste
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kailash Sonkar
Appellant
Smt. Maya Devi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Judgment in Election Petition No. 2 of 1980
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a person born to Christian parents and reconverted to Hinduism can claim scheduled caste status for contesting reserved legislative elections.
- 2 Whether Hindu on conversion to another religion loses the original caste and whether the caste revives on reconversion.
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent, though born to Christian parents, had voluntarily reconverted to Hinduism, performed necessary religious and social rites, was accepted by the Katia scheduled caste community, and was thus entitled to claim scheduled caste status under law for the purpose of contesting election from a reserved constituency. The original caste, having been under eclipse due to conversion, revived upon genuine reconversion.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Judgment of the High Court confirming the election of the respondent is affirmed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment