SANGHAMITRA GHOSH versus KAJAL KUMAR GHOSH
The Supreme Court held that, owing to the irretrievable breakdown of marriage, disappearance of emotional substratum, and public interest, it is appropriate to declare defunct de jure a marriage already defunct de facto, exercising its powers under Article 142 to grant divorce by mutual consent and dispose of all pending litigation between the parties.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Sanghamitra Ghosh; Respondent: Kajal Kumar Ghosh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Transfer Petition (civil and Criminal) and Matrimonial Suit / Disposal With Final Orders
- Outcome
- Divorce granted by mutual consent; all pending cases between parties disposed of.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Custody of Child, Jurisdiction Under Article 142
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sanghamitra Ghosh
Petitioner
Kajal Kumar Ghosh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Transfer Petition (civil and Criminal) and Matrimonial Suit / Disposal With Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court can dissolve the marriage by mutual consent under Article 142 of the Constitution despite the procedural requirements of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
- 2 Whether the marriage between the parties is irretrievably broken down warranting divorce
- 3 Disposition of all pending cases arising out of matrimonial proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that, owing to the irretrievable breakdown of marriage, disappearance of emotional substratum, and public interest, it is appropriate to declare defunct de jure a marriage already defunct de facto, exercising its powers under Article 142 to grant divorce by mutual consent and dispose of all pending litigation between the parties.
Court Disposition
Divorce granted by mutual consent; all pending cases between parties disposed of.
Orders
- The parties are directed to strictly adhere to the Terms of Compromise filed before this Court and also the orders and directions passed by this Court.
- All cases pending between the parties, as enumerated, are disposed of in view of settlement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment