KAKALI GHOSH versus CHIEF SECRETARY, ANDAMAN & NICOBAR ADMINISTRATION AND ORS.
Respondents did not provide any reason to refuse the appellant 730 days of continuous Child Care Leave. The Tribunal was correct in directing that leave should be granted in strict accordance with DOPT guidelines and Rule 43-C. High Court's finding was not based on the rules or guidelines. The appellant is entitled to 730 days CCL as per the rules, subject to exigencies of public service which have not been shown in this case.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kakali Ghosh; Respondents: Chief Secretary, Andaman & Nicobar Administration and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Child Care Leave, Central Civil Services (leave) Rules, 1972, DOPT Guidelines, Leave for Women Government Employees
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kakali Ghosh
Appellant
Chief Secretary, Andaman & Nicobar Administration and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a woman employee of the Central Government can ask for uninterrupted 730 days of Child Care Leave under Rule 43-C of the Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972.
Ratio Decidendi
Respondents did not provide any reason to refuse the appellant 730 days of continuous Child Care Leave. The Tribunal was correct in directing that leave should be granted in strict accordance with DOPT guidelines and Rule 43-C. High Court's finding was not based on the rules or guidelines. The appellant is entitled to 730 days CCL as per the rules, subject to exigencies of public service which have not been shown in this case.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Impugned judgment dated 18.09.2012 of the High Court is set aside.
- Judgment and order dated 30.04.2012 of the Central Administrative Tribunal affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment