KAMLESHWAR PRASAD versus PRADUMANJU AGARWAL (DEAD) BY LRS.

KAMLESHWAR PRASAD versus PRADUMANJU AGARWAL (DEAD) BY LRS.

The Supreme Court held that the landlord's bona fide requirement for the premises does not lapse with his death as the business can be carried on by his legal heirs, and the crucial date is the date of application for eviction. The appellate authority's final order cannot be disturbed by the High Court under Articles 226 or 227 by considering subsequent events.

Parties
Appellant: Kamleshwar Prasad; Respondent: Pradumanju Agarwal (Dead) by LRs.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
02 April 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Allahabad High Court Judgment in C.m.w.p. No. 13903 of 1991
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Bona Fide Requirement, Eviction, Supervisory Jurisdiction, Finality of Decrees, Effect of Subsequent Events

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kamleshwar Prasad

Appellant

Pradumanju Agarwal (Dead) by LRs.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Allahabad High Court Judgment in C.m.w.p. No. 13903 of 1991

  1. 1 Does the bona fide requirement for eviction under U.P. Act XIII of 1972 lapse upon the death of the landlord?
  2. 2 Can the High Court interfere with a final decree of eviction upon subsequent events under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution?

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the landlord's bona fide requirement for the premises does not lapse with his death as the business can be carried on by his legal heirs, and the crucial date is the date of application for eviction. The appellate authority's final order cannot be disturbed by the High Court under Articles 226 or 227 by considering subsequent events.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed without any order as to costs.