KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THR. VICE CHAIRMAN versus SHEO PRAKASH GUPTA & ANR.
There is nothing on record to suggest that notice was properly served on the appellant-Authority before the State Commission passed an ex parte order. The National Commission erred in holding otherwise without evidence of service of notice.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kanpur Development Authority through Vice Chairman; Respondent: Sheo Prakash Gupta & Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed and matter remitted
- Legal Topics
- Service of Notice, Ex Parte Orders, Deficiency in Service, Unfair Trade Practices, Refund of Deposited Amount
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kanpur Development Authority through Vice Chairman
Appellant
Sheo Prakash Gupta & Anr.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether notice was properly served on the appellant-Authority by the State Commission before passing ex parte order
- 2 Whether the appellant-Authority was afforded an opportunity to be heard
Ratio Decidendi
There is nothing on record to suggest that notice was properly served on the appellant-Authority before the State Commission passed an ex parte order. The National Commission erred in holding otherwise without evidence of service of notice.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed and matter remitted
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The impugned order and judgment passed by the National Commission is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment